Monday, November 18, 2019
Wednesday, November 6, 2019
Negative Consequences of Whistleblowing
Negative Consequences of Whistleblowing
Companies expect employees to be loyal, which makes whistleblowing a big deal. Whistleblowers are employees of governments, businesses or nonprofits who "blow the whistle" by reporting wrongdoing to people outside the organization, such as media, regulators or police. It's a controversial act, and many employees who do it experience negative effects of whistleblowing.
Why Blow the Whistle?
Many organizations have a formal procedure in place for dealing with illegal acts such as sexual harassment, racial discrimination or fraud. If your supervisor is sexually harassing your coworker, for instance, the usual procedure would involve reporting this to human resources and letting HR investigate and resolve the case.
Established procedures don't always work. Human resources and upper management may receive a complaint and take no action, particularly if the wrongdoing implicates someone who holds a lot of power in the organization. If the company is engaged in widespread fraud, for example billing Medicare for services it doesn't provide, nobody may be willing to take responsibility for fixing it. At this point, going outside the company may be the only solution.
While organizations often dismiss whistleblowers as disgruntled employees out for revenge, most whistle-blowers are trying to right the wrongs they see. Although the government offers financial incentives for whistleblowers to report fraud, personal ethics usually count far more than money in motivating whistleblowers.
Consequences of Whistleblowing
One reason organizations hate whistleblowers is the consequences of whistleblowing. Once police, the government or auditors launch an investigation, the organization loses control of its own affairs. It has to open its books and records to outsiders and may face financial or legal penalties.
Because the consequences of whistleblowing are so disruptive, the bar is set high for when whistleblowing is justified:
Other efforts to fix the problem, such as reporting it to HR or upper management, have gone nowhere.
The whistleblower's safety is at risk if they stay silent or report it by the usual channels.
The whistleblower has good reason for believing the wrongdoing exists.
The whistleblower has evidence to back up their charges.
Exposing the wrongdoing will accomplish some public good.
Protection for Whistleblowers
To avoid the negative impacts of whistleblowing, federal rules bar workplace retaliation in whistleblower cases. If an employee reports wrongdoing, the organization cannot legally take any "adverse action" against them. That includes firing, laying off, blacklisting, demoting, disciplining, denying benefits, intimidating, threatening or cutting pay.
Negative Effects of Whistleblowing
Despite the ban on retaliating against whistleblowers, blowback happens. A 2014 survey found that less than 10 percent of federal employee whistleblowers were thanked for identifying a problem; a third said they'd been threatened with retaliation or experienced it. Many whistleblowers have learned the hard way about the negative impacts of whistleblowing on their lives and careers.
Employers may fire a whistleblower, or pressure them into quitting.
Employees who don't quit may be bullied, demoted, isolated or harassed.
Some whistleblowers crack, becoming depressed, suffering panic attacks or drinking to cope with the pressure.
An employer may push a whistleblower into mental health counseling, then portray them as mentally ill and unreliable.
Military members who blow the whistle may be imprisoned and charged with treason or espionage.
Although retaliation is illegal, it's possible to portray retaliation as something else, for example, a negative review for poor performance.
Making Anonymous Reports
Because of the negative effects of whistleblowing, making anonymous reports is safer for the informant. The flip side is that it might make it easier for people to make frivolous or inaccurate charges, or make claims out of revenge or rivalry. Critics of anonymity say it might end up hurting the public interest instead of helping it.
Companies expect employees to be loyal, which makes whistleblowing a big deal. Whistleblowers are employees of governments, businesses or nonprofits who "blow the whistle" by reporting wrongdoing to people outside the organization, such as media, regulators or police. It's a controversial act, and many employees who do it experience negative effects of whistleblowing.
Why Blow the Whistle?
Many organizations have a formal procedure in place for dealing with illegal acts such as sexual harassment, racial discrimination or fraud. If your supervisor is sexually harassing your coworker, for instance, the usual procedure would involve reporting this to human resources and letting HR investigate and resolve the case.
Established procedures don't always work. Human resources and upper management may receive a complaint and take no action, particularly if the wrongdoing implicates someone who holds a lot of power in the organization. If the company is engaged in widespread fraud, for example billing Medicare for services it doesn't provide, nobody may be willing to take responsibility for fixing it. At this point, going outside the company may be the only solution.
While organizations often dismiss whistleblowers as disgruntled employees out for revenge, most whistle-blowers are trying to right the wrongs they see. Although the government offers financial incentives for whistleblowers to report fraud, personal ethics usually count far more than money in motivating whistleblowers.
Consequences of Whistleblowing
One reason organizations hate whistleblowers is the consequences of whistleblowing. Once police, the government or auditors launch an investigation, the organization loses control of its own affairs. It has to open its books and records to outsiders and may face financial or legal penalties.
Because the consequences of whistleblowing are so disruptive, the bar is set high for when whistleblowing is justified:
Other efforts to fix the problem, such as reporting it to HR or upper management, have gone nowhere.
The whistleblower's safety is at risk if they stay silent or report it by the usual channels.
The whistleblower has good reason for believing the wrongdoing exists.
The whistleblower has evidence to back up their charges.
Exposing the wrongdoing will accomplish some public good.
Protection for Whistleblowers
To avoid the negative impacts of whistleblowing, federal rules bar workplace retaliation in whistleblower cases. If an employee reports wrongdoing, the organization cannot legally take any "adverse action" against them. That includes firing, laying off, blacklisting, demoting, disciplining, denying benefits, intimidating, threatening or cutting pay.
Negative Effects of Whistleblowing
Despite the ban on retaliating against whistleblowers, blowback happens. A 2014 survey found that less than 10 percent of federal employee whistleblowers were thanked for identifying a problem; a third said they'd been threatened with retaliation or experienced it. Many whistleblowers have learned the hard way about the negative impacts of whistleblowing on their lives and careers.
Employers may fire a whistleblower, or pressure them into quitting.
Employees who don't quit may be bullied, demoted, isolated or harassed.
Some whistleblowers crack, becoming depressed, suffering panic attacks or drinking to cope with the pressure.
An employer may push a whistleblower into mental health counseling, then portray them as mentally ill and unreliable.
Military members who blow the whistle may be imprisoned and charged with treason or espionage.
Although retaliation is illegal, it's possible to portray retaliation as something else, for example, a negative review for poor performance.
Making Anonymous Reports
Because of the negative effects of whistleblowing, making anonymous reports is safer for the informant. The flip side is that it might make it easier for people to make frivolous or inaccurate charges, or make claims out of revenge or rivalry. Critics of anonymity say it might end up hurting the public interest instead of helping it.
For your digital advertising and placement, contact LIG
Friday, November 1, 2019
Wednesday, October 30, 2019
AN EFFECT IN EXCHANGE RATE ON BALANCE OF PAYMENT IN NIGERIA
CERTIFICATION
We
the undersigned certify that this research work, whose title is “An effect in
exchange rate on balance of payment in Nigeria.
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1
OVERVIEW OF THE STUDY
Since 1982, Nigeria has been
experiencing a propound and sustained economic crisis unparallel in her
contemporary economic history, indeed from the economic squall of 1978, Nigeria
has been unsteadily and dangerously towards the devastating economic hurricane
of the 1980’s. It can be said that the deepening current Nigeria economic
crisis has in long term perspective spanned about two decades since 1978. the
crisis has in general been manifested in acute problem of fiscal in balances
and accommodating monetary policy or expansionary fiscal and monetary policies,
fragile export base and weak non-oil export earning, import dependent
production structure, and weak production base and undiversified nature of the
economy. Other problems include unprecedently increasing level of unemployment
of the energetic imaginative, innovative and highly educated and skilled
section of the capacity utilization in the manufacturing industries. All these
and many others resulted into serious foreign exchange problem, because
exchange controls were not applied consistently and the administered exchange
rate mechanism adopted let to the over valuation of the naira exchange rate.
Nigeria has been endangered by high rate of foreign exchange inflation and
balance of payment disequilibrium which led to series of political unrest and
social disorder such as the 29-9% average annual growth rate in 1980-1984 as
recorded by the total domestics credits to the economy and most of the increase
was attributable to net claims by government. Simultaneously two-digit
inflation at a mean yearly rate of 20.2% was registered, clear evidence perhaps
in support of the monetarist’s proposition. But the inflation in 1984, which
stood at almost 40%, is often explained in terms of acute storages of imported
goods and services imposed by inade4quate foreign exchange earnings.
Before the introduction of structural
adjustment programme (SAP) in 1986, the Nigeria economy was obviously distress
the demand for external reserve was high while the balance of payment areas
pushed the country to an economically disadvantage position. Real output
declined and hence import which in turn resulted to the decline in foreign
exchange earnings and as such ASP which is structural adjustment programmed was
introduced in 1986 to eliminate these observed distortion in the economy. Also
due to the deepening internal and external disequilibrium, it then became
imperative to adopt the structural adjustment programme (SAP). The SAP is
predicated mainly on the principle of “getting price right and has foreign
exchange rate reform as it central focus. In pursuit of this, the second tier
foreign market (SFEM) was brought in existence in late September 1986. the SFEM
later metamorphosis 1.9 something change completely into the foreign exchange
market (FEM) inter-bank foreign and exchange market (IFEM) then Autonomous
foreign exchange market (AFEM), but now, it’s back to IFEM, all reflecting a
high degree of deregulation. The SFEM 1.9. The second tier foreign market was
predicated on the attainment of a realistic exchange rate of the naira, through
depreciation by the market forces of supply and demand for foreign exchange. It
was expected that a realistic exchange rate should reduce excessive demand for
foreign exchange, especially for the
importation of finished exchange as well as eliminating the prevailing
distortions in the economy and stimulate non-oil exports. In addition, the new
foreign exchange management system was to be relied upon to eliminated illegal
currency trafficking, smuggling activities and foreign exchange malpractices if
the objective of eliminating bureaucratic and rigid exchange control could be
attained (OJO, 1990).
So far, most of the desired exchange
rate objective have not been achieved because that prevailing exchange rate now
cannot be described as a realistic exchange rate. In essence, it hence reduced
excessive demand for foreign exchange neither has it stimulated none of
exports; foreign exchange capital inflow has been below expectations while
capital flight has heightened. Yet the unstable exchange rate and the balance
of payment deficit position would be better appreciated of its nature dimension
and causes are closely understood.
1.2
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEMS
Prior to the adoption of
structural adjustment program (SAP) in 1986, Nigeria had no well spelt out
trade policies. The practice was the formulation of trade policies, meant to
protect the local industries, thus the policies consist of qualitative import
controls administered through import licensing system relatively high tariffs
and imposition of quantity restrictions on imports by way of quotas and the
outright ban on certain items. All these measures limits the free movement of
goods and services and hence exchange of currencies between Nigeria and other
countries as a result, the exchange rate of the naira has been greatly affected
by this economic controls. Typical of this economic control was the exchange
control system based largely on the exchange control act of 1962, which was
applied vigorously during the civil war and up to 1971, during which the
Nigeria currency became increasingly, unconvertible.
However, the problem of
foreign exchange inadequacy, dependence on the oil sector for exchange earning,
continuous depreciation of the naira exchange rate coupled with the inability
to determine precisely the level of exchange rate of the naira that would
ensure the internal and external balance simultaneously. The existence of black
market where the naira is exchange with other currencies illegally has also
affected the exchange rate in the sense that the black market violates all
policies and regulatory measures used by the government to control the exchange
rate of the naira and as such the existence of these black market has to a
large extent distorted the effective measure of exchange of Nigeria currency
(Naira) with those of other currencies and as the records (data) of exchange
does not reflect the actual exchange due to the existence of the black market.
1.5
SCOPE OF THE STUDY
Balance of payment deficit and
unstable exchange rate is a global phenomenon and has not been smooth in it’s
movement in Nigeria. This study examines the relationship between balance of
payment and exchange rate using 1980-2004 as a reference period.
This period is chosen because 1980-1985
is the pre-SAP period while 1986-1988 is the SAP period and 1984-2004 is the
post-SAP period.
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
CONCEPT OF FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATE
The main objective of
exchange rate policy during the early years of 1980’s was to check inflationary
pressures. This was achieved by maintaining an overvalued exchange rate so as
to encourage importation. Consequently the exchange rate was maintained well
below the equilibrium level. The official average rate was ($100=N0.8924)
between 1980-1985 compared with purchasing power parity (PPP) rate of ($1.00=
N3.4716).
In
1986, a market driven exchange rate policy was therefore put in place to adjust
the exchange rate to it’s equilibrium and reflect from export and payment for
import over a specified period of time usually a year.
III. MONETARY POLICY: this has to do with the regulation of money supply by the monetary
authorities of a country to affect the real sector of the economy.
III
MONETARY POLICY: This has to do with the regulation
of money supply by the monetary authorities of a country to affect the real
sector of the economy.
IV FISCAL POLICY: This policy involves the control of taxes and
government expenditure. It is often called “power of the purse” entrustment.
V INFLATION: This is the persistent and appreciable increase in
general price level of an economy.
VI UNEMPLOYMENT: Is a situation which arises when able-bodies member
of the labour force who are qualified and willing to work at the prevailing
wage rate in an economy present themselves for payment but cannot get jobs.
NATIONAL INCOME: As a money or market value of the final goods and services currently
produced in an economy by its citizens during a particular period of time
usually one year.
DEFICIT: is a
situation whereby the government expenditure exceeds it revenue target there by
creating government dis-savings that could result in public borrowing of
financing programme R L E.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE MARKET: Foreign exchange market deals with the sales and purchases
of foreign currencies where importers buy foreign currencies to pay for import.
DEPRECIATION:
is an allowance made in estimates, valuation on balance sheet, normally for
wear and tear of assets.
REGRESSION:
This is the study of relationship among variables.
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 CONCEPT OF BALANCE OF PAYMENT
The
balance of payment is a statistical statement summarizing for a specific time
frame, economic transaction between residents of an economy and the rest of the
world. Specifically, the balance of payment record the import and exports of
goods, services and income and transfer as well as changes in a country’s
liabilities to and claim (assets) on the rest of the world or non residents.
Thus the balance of payment is a flow and not a stock concept and it involves
more than payments. In other words, certain transaction which may not have been
paid for in cash and kind are also recorded gifts in cash and kind, deferment
of debt service payment due, as well as unmerited profit among others.
The
balance of payment is broadly structured into the current and capital accounts.
The current account records transactions in goods, service and income as well
as unrequited transfer which the capital account (excluding reserve movement)
refers to changes in financial assets and liabilities specifically, the capital
account records transactions in direct and portfolio investment, external loan
drawing and amortization changes in shirt term capital including the net change
in commercial and merchant banks assets and liabilities as well as errors and
omissions. It also records reserve movement, which refers to transaction
relating to central bank holding of gold, special drawing right (SDR) foreign
exchange and use of fund credit.
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
SUMMARY
The
data analysis in chapter four is in line with appropriate expectation and also
in consensus with the reviewed literature, it show that there is a relationship
between exchange rate and Nigeria’s balance of payments and that is an issue
independence. It should be mentioned that a lot of the seed of payment problem
and that of exchange rate were some by colonial masters which came with the
objective or exploiting the country and the over and under earnings and the
values of imports.
For
this reason therefore, it is clear that factors which have contributed to the
weakness of balance of payments includes, the poor performance of non-oil
exports fluctuation in crude oil prices, lack of meaningful participation by
Nigeria’s in the provision of international service related to shipping,
insurance and tourism as well as the low level of income from direct investment
aboard by Nigerians. Others include low level of loan disbursement leading to
net transfer of resource aboard and the high debt service payments. However,
these factors include lack of adequate strategy for managing crude oil shock,
hostile international economic environment, lack of progress in restructuring
Nigeria a long term basis, slippages in monetary and fiscal policy
implementation, high and volume of imports due to the high demand for foreign
goods. All these have effect on the balance of payment position.
CONCLUSION
Since
1982, when the second oil shock and shock ans debit burden became seriously
pronounced the Nigeria’s balance of payment have been under persistent
pressure, attempt towards managing balance of payment involving restrictive
exchange rate practice failed to achieve the objective of policy. The
liberalization of exchange controls and the instruction of a market bases
exchange mechanism with the commencement of the structural adjustment
programmed [SAP] temporarily stabilized international payment. However,
slippages in policy, in particular the pressure on the external sector. Non-oil
export that initially rose at the incitation of [SAP] declined after some time
and remained low and this has affected the balance of payment position.
This
disparity in the size of oil export and non export in terms of relative
comparism, the unfavorable domestic and international economic environment have
constrained the achievement of balance and sustained economic growth that could
foster balance of payment viability.
However,
if the foreign exchange rate policies are seriously implemented as well as the
recommendation started earlier, then the Nigeria’s balance of payment will
improve to sustain and revamp the economy from it’s present predicament.
RECOMMENDATION
The
following recommendations are suggested to correct the worrisome mistake of the
past and create positive and dynamically viable level of balance of payment a
stable exchange rate.
1. the
unification of the official and autonomous exchange rate will reduce the distortion
effect of such divergence and encourage non-oil export.
2. resolution
of the external debt problem by way of restructuring the external debt so as to
reduce the debt service payments to a level that will release resources for
domestic use in the productive sectors of the economy. To achieve this
objective, the need to conclude a medium term economic restructuring programmed
with the international monetary fund [IMF] becomes very compelling.
3.
increase
the non-oil export commodities.
4.
harmonization
of monetary non-oil export and fiscal policies.
5.
protection
of small scale industries
6. encouraging
the agricultural sector so as to increase agricultural export.
Reference
IGANIGA B.O
(2000) The Structure Of The Nigeria Financial System First Edition Amfitop
Ekpoma Books
For complete project work, please 07031335805 or email @ shalomodion@gmail.com
For Purchase, please use ourtbank services
Firstbank of Nigeria
3082143955
Name: Shallom Odion Egbon
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
Countries and Their Cultures Countries and Their Cultures Ma-Ni Culture of Nigeria Nigeria Culture Name Nigerian Orientation ...
-
Find My iPhone was an app and service provided by Apple Inc. that allowed remote location tracking of iOS devices , Mac computers, ...
-
Scientific visualization A scientific visualization of a simulation of a Rayleigh–Taylor instability caused by two mixing fluids.[1] Surf...
